Unusual Speed Limit Sign

Posted February 23, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags:

This is quite the street sign for people to read and comply with. The sign instructs drivers to slow down to 25 mph between 6:49-7:15, 7:52-8:22 and 8:37-9:07 during the morning and 2:03-2:33, 3:04-3:34 and 3:59-4:29 during the afternoon on school days. At all other times the speed limit is 45 mph. After public outcry and national media attention the sign was changed.

White Lake officials said the township did not install the sign, while the county’s Road Commission blamed the school district for its unwillingness to pay for an electric sign that would eliminate the need for the printed time ranges.

If lack of communication among government officials causes something like this to happen over a street sign one can only imagine what other problems are being created.

Amazing High School Student Challenges Himself To Grow

Posted February 22, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags:

Stan Wier is a talented high school basketball player who is driven to challenge himself and improve his skills. As explained in a Buffalo News article, Stan has purposely played for three different high school teams, one of which was out of state in an effort to challenge himself and become better as a player. In Weir’s own words:

“… my goal was to become the best basketball player I could”. When he went to Indiana Weir states “I could see some of the best players in the country and you can see how you stack up. You find out your weaknesses and build upon your strengths.”

With each move Weir had to adapt to a new team, coach and teammates and off the court he had to adjust to different classes, teachers and social circles.

At East Aurora high school Wier has broken the school record for most points scored in a season and he has committed to play basketball for the University of Buffalo next year.

Part of Wier’s daily routine is that he gets up early every morning to practice hundreds of jump shots. He keeps a daily basketball journal to focus his efforts on improving as a player. Success in any field is not easy. Clearly Wier has a passion for basketball and a desire to be great. Staying on the same team for four years, while challenging is pretty safe and routine compared to the approach Wier has taken. Walking into a new environment and purposely competing with people who are better than you is scary to everyone and I am sure that it was scary to Wier as well. Dealing with and conquering fear is an important part of success that Wier has learned a great deal about.

Whether in Basketball or life in general, Wier has developed a good approach, which we all can learn from.

7 Signs Of A High Performance Local Government

Posted February 21, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

All organizations have their own unique culture. The culture in great organizations  is visible from how positive and engaged employees are between themselves and when interacting with customers. In a previous post I highlighted 7 signs of a dysfunctional organization.

Steve Tobak of CBS News.com wrote an article titled 7 Signs of a High-Performance Companywhich I believe  applies to local governments as well as it does to private sector companies. Tobak’s 7 signs are below:

Employees take ownership. When employees discover problems or issues, they take the initiative to ensure that they’re resolved. They don’t leave it for the next guy because it’s not their job, not their fault, or not their responsibility.

People are happy. People look and act as if they’re genuinely happy to be at work. No, they shouldn’t be running around laughing like children in a playground, but you can tell that they like what they’re doing and are having a good time doing it.

Managers are comfortable with their level of authority. They’re clear on what their authority is and they’re not resentful of what it isn’t. That means decision-making occurs at the right level, no higher or lower than it should be. Managers aren’t afraid to be overruled or second-guessed.

People are accountable. Folks say what they mean and mean what they say. They don’t promise what they can’t deliver or sandbag to get big kudos when they over-deliver. They tell you what they think they can do and are willing to be held accountable for the results.

There’s a “How can I help you?” attitude. We used to call that a customer service attitude, but it’s so much more than that. People never act put off, defensive, or interrupted by requests from anyone inside or outside the company.

Employees have a positive outlook. Whining and complaining is an epidemic in the modern business world. But there are companies where negative behavior is an outlier, meaning it stands out and is eventually flushed out, one way or another.

Things get done. Perhaps the most evident sign of a highly effective organization is that things just seem to get done. That’s because people get things done. The company operates like a well-oiled machine. Yes, I know it’s an old metaphor, but I don’t know a better one.

What do you think are the biggest obstacles that cause local governments to fall short on these 7 items?

Patronage Questions Asked In 1883 Are Still Relevant Today

Posted February 20, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , ,

The New York State Civil Service Commission began with the enactment of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act in 1883. The law was passed after the assassination of President James Garfield, who was shot by a disgruntled seeker of a government job.

The theory behind creating civil service was that competitive examinations and requiring the hiring of those who achieved the highest scores, would prevent politicians from steering jobs to supporters who in many instances were not the most qualified for the positions they filled. Assemblyman Theodore Roosevelt sponsored the bill in 1883 that made New York the first state to establish a civil service system. His goal was to base the hiring of government workers on merit, not patronage. In November of 1883, the New York State Civil Service Commission forwarded written questions to officials across New York State “…with reference to the action of political parties and public officers in the matter of patronage”. One hundred and twenty nine years later the questions asked in 1883 are still relevant today as political patronage is alive and well particularly at the local government level.

Below are a few of the questions asked in 1883 by the New York State Civil Service Commission. You can view all of the questions and the answers submitted by several individuals including Assemblymember Theodore Roosevelt and Thomas J. Rogers, City of Buffalo Engineer. The questions and answers begin on page 219.

  • Are appointments made by the … the recommendation of local committees, or public officers, or of prominent representatives of any political party?
  • When two persons of equal apparent merit apply for position, and one has the support of political committees, or prominent politicians, or partisan reasons of any kind to recommend him, and the other has none of these, to which of the applicants … is the preference given?
  • Is the partisan services previously rendered, or the partisan service expected in the future, a controlling reason for making appointments…?
  •  What proportion of appointments are made solely upon the ground of merit and the fitness of the appointee, without expectation of partisan service or the desire to oblige some prominent partisan recommending the appointee?
  • … is it or is it not considered treachery to a political party or organization to appoint persons to subordinate positions not of the same political party or organization as the officer who makes the appointment?
  •  Is it possible for a public officer, deriving his own title or position through the action of a political party, to act independently in making appointments of subordinates, and disregard the recommendations or requests of his political associates or friends, without losing or putting in jeopardy his own political standing and influence?
  • By the present methods, are removals of subordinates made for political reasons, or to provide places for political friends?
  •  …. do persons seeking appointments as subordinates depend mostly upon the power and influence of the political party which they belong, or upon their qualifications and fitness for the position?
  • Is the public service elevated or lower by the present methods of appointment and removal,…?
  • Would the public interest be advanced by prescribing competitive tests or standards of appointments for any subordinate public servants…?

There are certainly pros and cons to the civil service system but without a doubt politicians have found many ways to game the system in an effort to fill positions with political supporters.

7 Signs Your Local Government Is Dysfunctional

Posted February 19, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

Leadership is about somehow getting people with different views to come together and execute on goals and plans they would never agree to on their own. Clearly, that’s not happening in many local governments.

Polarizing leadership and divisive management are real and entirely common issues that destroy organizational effectiveness and ultimately lead to operating failure in local governments big and small.  Steve Tobak of CBS News.com recently wrote an article titled the 7 Signs of a Dysfunctional Company. I have taken Tobak’s seven signs and applied them to local government, where I believe they fit as well.

Here are seven signs that your local government is dysfunctional with polarizing leadership:

Ivory tower effect. When self-important elected officials make decisions in a vacuum or otherwise barricade themselves in their offices, that creates a nasty cultural divide between management and employees. I love the show Under Cover Boss, as it shows the importance of getting to know what your employees have to deal with when performing their jobs. Not enough elected officials understand or listen to employees as part of their decision making process.

Warring factions. In some communities feuds along political party lines are common place and accepted as just the way government works. Heck as I have talked about in a previous post Democrats and Republicans are not even allowed to sit next to each other. In the City of Buffalo all nine Councilmembers are Democrats and they are split into a 5-4 faction that fights over power and patronage in the third poorest city in the nation. Warring factions are dysfunctional, divisive and they fosters rivalry instead of cooperation.

Strategy du jour. When dysfunctional elected officials consistently overreact to a single data point and take the entire organization in a new direction. Often the result of hallway or ad-hoc meetings in obscure places and making decisions in the absence of those who are actually responsible for that sort of thing.

Analysis paralysis. When elected officials, especially from warring factions, chronically debate issues to death, going down one rat hole or knock-down, drag-out fight after another without actually making decisions because there’s no clear leadership to drive consensus.

Walk on water behavior. When leaders either consciously or subconsciously hoist certain groups up on pedestals while denigrating others. Besides being divisive, that also creates “walk on water” behavior where exalted groups aren’t subject to standard processes like budgeting, for example.

Silo mentality. When teams, departments or entire divisions act as if they’re independent from the rest , usually in a defensive “it’s us against them” sort of way when fighting for resources. Often the result of being denigrated by dysfunctional and divisive elected officials. A.k.a. “bunker mentality.”

Sacred cow. A pet project — usually supported by an elected official — that’s immune to criticism and the government’s standard processes. In other words, it continues to be funded long after it shouldn’t.

What do you think about these seven signs of dysfunction? Are there others that you would add to this list?

 

And The Most Corrupt Government Award Goes To…?

Posted February 17, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

According to a study by the University of Illinois at Chicago’s Institute of Government and Public Affairs, Chicago is the most corrupt city in the nation and New York State is the most corrupt state.

Since 1976, 2,522 people have been convicted of federal public corruption charges in New York State (70 per year). Since 1976 the Chicago metro area has had 1,531 federal public corruption convictions.

For complete list of states and cities making the top 10 list for federal convictions check out the study, which recommends adopting the following reforms to address corruption in Chicago.

1. Amend the City’s Ethics Ordinance to cover aldermen and their staff;
2. Give the Inspector General access to all city documents including those held
secret by the Corporation Counsel;
3. Ban all gifts to all elected officials and public employees except those from
family members;
4. Bar all lobbying of other governmental bodies by elected officials and city
employees;
5. Prohibit double dipping, patronage and nepotism with real penalties including
firing; and
6. Improve the city’s ethics training and bring it up to at least the State of Illinois
level.

 

Buffalo’s State Of The City Represents A Failed Approach

Posted February 16, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , , , ,

Very few town board or city councils actually set goals or involve the community in goal setting and reviewing the accomplishment of goals. Bay City Michigan (population 35,000), does all of the above. As reported in the Bay City News , the City Commission invited the public to participate in a Saturday meeting to set goals for the City Manager. A few months ago the City Manager in a public session and in a private session with city officials explained how he met last year’s goals. Input is being sought from city residents to prioritize a list of goals for 2012.

In contrast every year the Mayor of Buffalo holds a state of the city address where without any discussion with city councilmembers or community members the Mayor proposes his goals and initiatives for the year. As the Buffalo News reports, the Mayor’s success in achieving the yearly goals he puts out are mixed. ”The Buffalo News asked the Brown administration last week for more information about four projects and initiatives announced in prior State of the City addresses. The Mayor’s Office did not respond to The News’ inquiries for information.”

When the Buffalo Common Council President was asked about the four initiatives according to the Buffalo News “He said he wasn’t familiar enough with them to provide more information.” Councilmember David Rivera stated “If the information about previous projects is difficult for a reporter to obtain, imagine what the public gets.”Rivera said it’s important to have checks and balances in government so that such information can be tracked and disclosed.”I’d imagine if they did what they said they were going to do,” Rivera said, “they’d have press conferences.”

The process utilized in Buffalo does not sufficiently engage fellow elected officials and community members in setting goals for the City. The communication necessary to get people on board and committed to making things happen simply does not take place. The end result is that not a lot gets done other than the initial splash of press coverage.

The approach utilized in Bay City takes time, but in the end it is a better approach to setting government goals and monitoring their accomplishment. There is never a meeting in Buffalo where elected officials review stated goals and discuss whether they have been achieved or not. Elected officials don’t like to be held accountable and Buffalo’s dysfunctional way of operating ensures that little gets accomplished without anyone being held responsible.

For many years Mayors and City Councilmembers in Buffalo have utilized a flawed approach in setting goals and the lack of real results in a City, which is the third poorest in the Nation speaks volumes. Instead of doing the same process year after year, maybe some future Mayor or City Council will try a different way?

 

Does Your Local Government Have “An Open Government Team”?

Posted February 14, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

The City of Reno Nevada (population 220,000) has created an Open Government Team, which on their web site is described below as:

Open Government Team

We are currently forming an internal Open Government Team led by our Web Services Manager. Team members will come from all departments and all levels, with the intention of supporting our external transparency efforts.

Here are some of the goals of this team:

  • Identify and implement opportunities to share data and information
  • Develop policies and procedures related to transparency
  • Oversee use of web, social media, and print communications in transparency
  • Provide related content for internal blog
  • Support the City Clerk’s Office in open records planning and public records requests
  • Support Neighborhood Services in media relations
  • Advise web and intranet development teams

In addition to the Open Government Team Reno has an online checkbook where anyone can check what each department is spending and what vendors are receiving payment. Reno is even soliciting ideas on how to be more transparent by placing the following on their web site:

Help Us Improve

Listing our datasets is just a start. Please help us improve by letting us know what type of data you’d like to see and how we as a government can be more transparent. Please send your suggestions and ideas toOpenReno@reno.gov.

It is amazing how many committees and boards local governments have for every topic imaginable, yet very few have devoted resources to something like an Open Government Team. A lot of elected officials talk about transparency but few take the step of pushing the bureaucracy to become more open and transparent. Bringing staff from all departments together to create an Open Government Team is a great idea. What do you think?

www.paulwolfideas.com

Government Checkbook 2.0

Posted February 13, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

The office of the New York City Comptroller has a great web site that provides a comprehensive look, updated daily, at nearly every check issued by the city. The current Comptroller web site is being updated to provide detailed information about the contracts related to each individual payment, city vendors and the contracts they’re working on, and how payments made to date stack up against each agency’s budget. The site will also include information about incoming revenues, audits, budget reports and other analysis produced by the entities responsible for monitoring the city’s finances.

City finances will be provided as an open-source project allowing software developers to utilize the information in unique and creative ways, which will increase the transparency and public access to New York City’s finance information. Nick Judd of Personal Democracy Media has written an article which contains more details about the revamping of the New York City Comptroller’s web site.

The open-source nature of this means that public information can be sorted and tracked in as many creative ways as talented people can develop. It would be great to see  local elected officials champion similar projects. What do you think?

How Denver Health Spectacularly Improved Their Operations

Posted February 12, 2012 by paulwolf2
Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: , ,

Patricia A. Gabow, M.D., CEO of Denver Health and Hospital Authority, has spectacularly  improved Denver’s public hospital and busiest trauma center by asking the right questions and implementing Lean.

In a blog post by Matthew Weinstock at Hospitals and Health Network Gabow says, “I was really becoming frustrated that we were doing things pretty much the same way as when I was an intern 40 years earlier,” Gabow says. “I started to ask myself, ‘Is there any other industry that has been so stuck in time and been successful?’ I talked to a service line director about it and he suggested that we did things the same way because it worked. ‘Give me a break. We can do better.’ I told him.”

So, around 2004, Denver Health applied for and got a grant to see if there was indeed a better way. They built an advisory panel and brought in experts from other leading industries — Microsoft, Siemens, and FedEx. Gabow held upwards of 60 focus groups with Denver Health employees, asking two key questions:

“What are the things that keep you from being efficient?”

And,

“what do you see happening to patients that you think is wrong?”

After a year of studying operations, leadership determined that there wasn’t “one magic bullet,” Gabow says. Instead, they realized that they needed a series of “linked endeavors.” That’s when they turned to Lean management. Gabow says Lean is appealing because it is based on respect and innovation. Secondly, the tools used in Lean are intuitive and relatively easy to teach and learn. Implementing Lean management  in 2005, has resulted in the following achievements:

  • Trained more than 250 employees as black belts in Lean
  • Completed more than 400 rapid-improvement projects, resulting in that $135 million financial benefit due to performance improvements
  • Last year alone, the hospital saw $46 million in financial benefits from Lean projects.
  •  Impressively, Denver Health has achieved the high quality marks and boost to the bottom line without reducing the workforce.
  • #1 — ranking in patient survival among the nation’s academic medical centers
  • 100 percent — number of patients receiving antibiotics in pre-op
  • 80 percent and $1.75 million — drop in blood clots among hospitalized patients and the savings as a result of reduced complications
  •  An impressive 60 percent drop in Denver Health’s observed to expected mortality. “That meant that last year, 250 people walked out of our hospital alive who would have been expected to die at another academic health center.” stated Galbow.

As CEO of Denver Health, Gabow’s leadership and willingness to ask questions has had a huge impact at the hospital. What do you think of the approach utilized by Gabow at Denver Health?

 


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.